If I were describe the christian religion. I would describe it as a philosophy that says one must like people--
We must like everyone(gotta be a nice)even though the world is made up of mostly stupid, shallow, corrupt and degenerate people. We must looooove the dirt(let alone like)-Because "God loves everyone", so we should love(like) everyone too. Cute. In other words, we must walk around in an unatural self-imposed delusion pretending that we love(like) everyone and if we ever feel revulsion(hate) towards any fellow man we must feel bad--guilty that we did something wrong. "For I am a Christian" , thinks the deluded person "I should not be feeling any ill will towards any other person". Then the only ill will becomes inward, as one should think-"I am guilty of not liking people--I am bad-for God commands me to love everyone, even my enemies."
Nietzsche put it best, as he descibed this 'love' in #23 of The Anti-Christian:
"Love is the state in which man sees things most decidedly as they are not. The force of illusion reaches its highest here, and so does the capacity for sweetening, and transfiguring. People in love will tolerate more than they usually do, they will put up with anything. A religion had to be invented where people could 'love': it gets them through the worst in life-they stop noticing the bad aspects completely.—So much for the three Christian virtues: faith, hope and charity: I call them the three Christian ingenuities.—"
Christianity in its cleverness makes 'love' out to mean: ignore the bad aspects of life. But to ignore reality(to love) is to live in a fantasy, ie- The English don't mention the bad aspects of life/people--they look the other way--for they have good manners.
So with this 'love' comes toleration of the bad. As Nietzsche says,-"people in love will tolerate more" and "they stop noticing the bad aspects(of people) completely. " Which is why Nietzsche saw the Christian religion as a life denying force, promoting degeneracy and decadance. Jesus loved the prostitutes!, they say------
When a religion comes around and orders you to love everyone,---- and to forgive everyone!..........How silly........ It is saying we must deny our natural instincts (the carnal mind is enmity against God). But denying feelings of hate is such a hard thing to do. The Christian admits this, but because it is so, they pretend that this means it is such a sacred and holy thing. All things are possible with God, they say--God wants me to love and forgive. But when someone has to delude themselves into pretending they have no animosity towards people or things, what must they do? To please God, they must stop the animosity(feelings of hate). They soon declare that it is the actions(behavior) of others that is the source of the dreaded 'hate'. They may try hard, but they still can't stop having ill feelings(hate) against the evil-doer. But try they do- They come up with strange concepts such as hate the sin, but love the sinner--but this does not suffice--
----In truth, the only effective way to 'stop hate' one feels is to get rid of morality completely. We must lower the standards of what we expect out of other people--we must rationilze their behavior away as being "not that bad". This is the result of relying on silly and dangerous catch phrases 'love your enemies' and 'don't judge for it is God that will judge". Because the only way to do it-ie-To get rid of our evil feelings of hate, --to not get mad(angry) at people and to feel loooooove towards 'our enemies' We must learn to to at least be indifferent to the behavior(the source of our hate) that people create.
His name is Terry Richardson. click the link and then google his name. Now, all life affirming individuals have nothing but revulsion for this creep. We know, as life-affirming individuals that we are repulsed and have hate for this filth, but remember the delusion? The Christian says we must "love" him. But how in the world can you ever get me to love him?
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
"All Man Are Created Equal" Hoax
Get used to this--Judge says law unconstitutional. Judge overturns will of the people.
'Equality of conditions' is its debasing shibboleth and
verily he who has temerity enough to spit upon Equality is liable to
be horned to death.
False but seductive political idealisms
subtle supplements to the
fallacious, and equally delusive, (but pre-existent) religionisms and
moralisms. This cunning plot worked like a charm, for Equity of
Rights seemed to puritanic minds the logical outcome of that other
hoary old lie 'Equality before God.'
Many years after the 'Declaration' was issued, our written
Constitution was constructed with much voluble sophistry and
mimic strife. That document considered as a whole, is the most
cunningly worded and at the same time most terrible instrument of
Government and Mastership that any Anglo-Teutonic tribe has ever
yoked itself up under. Pretending to 'grant' liberty and self-
government, it practically annihilates both. Under the show of
'guaranteeing' personal independence and civil rights, it has
organized an elective tyranny
Indeed the written Constitution of our Republic is a
monstrous mechanical contrivance that bids fair (when once it has
got properly under way) to squeeze the very heart out of all the Best
Elements in America.
Thus it will be seen, the Jesuitic 'Evangel of Equality' has
proved itself a tremendous success. It seduced the American People
into a feeling of contentment and security till their 'bonds' and
fetters were properly forged, polished, and neatly riveted on........
Under the hypnotic spell of a 'free and equal' dream,
Americans have been hustled into a convict-prison of labonousness
to piratical masters a thousand times more terrible and more
unyielding than any history can describe. All that is now left of
Liberty is its name, and the harmless privilege the common people
have of scolding their Proprietors in vulgar editorial diatribes at or
about election times
Equality before the Law!! is all we mean, whimpers the
everlasting sophistic the cunning liar!
But, by what rational
method can any two litigants be placed in a position of
unconditional 'Equality before the Law?' First of all, plaintiff and
defendant always possess totally different physical and mental
characteristics, different personal magnetisms, and different sized
bank balances. Also, all judges, juries, and legal officials are
unequals in temperament, ability, courage, and honesty. Each one
has his own peculiar idiosyncrasies, prejudices, inferiorities,
superstitions, and price. Each again, may be more or less
dishonest and more or less subject to financial pressure or caste
bias . No two men are born alike, each one being literally born under
his own particular star, formed of different material, swayed by
different ideals, educated and moulded in a different mill, by a
different process.
Even if all tribunals of Justice were founded upon blind
Impartiality and administered free of cost, it will be plainly seen,
that 'Equality before the Law' remains a mere chimera, a dream;
and of no real value. 'Equality before the Law' is just a meaningless
catchword, something like that famous Jesuitism 'Liberty
regulated by Law.'
All judges are authorized avengers, armed to the teeth
a confederation of masterful
bandits to place themselves in positions of absolute equality, before
their intended victims
Las Casas, the Spanish Jesuit, was the first in America to
spread word about the false, subversive, and shameful theory of
'equal human rights,' but since his time it has been boastfully
accepted on all sides, by vast hordes of witless persons who are in
all countries, the numerical majority. "The race of fools" as Plato
sagaciously remarked, "is not to be counted" not even in this 'land of the free.'
Although Equality (in any shape) has never been
scientifically proven nor logically defended: nevertheless it passes
from tongue to tongue, from brain to brain in current discussions
for 'gospel truth' just as clever counterfeit coins are passed
unuspectingly from hand to hand.
The Equality superstition is tolerated by clear-seeing men,
for one reason only. It assists them to govern the thoughts: and by
governing the thoughts, to exploit the property, energy, and labor-
force, of their soft-minded, good natured neighbors: who really
believe it to be true— who think it, glad tidings of Great Joy.
Inequality of birth and condition, can never perish from off
the earth. Never! and why should it? Who can fill the valleys up and
lay the mountains low?
In actual life, he who claims equality with another, is ever
called upon to prove his claim, not by a grotesque abracadabra of
silly phrases, parroted from antique philosophers or blue-mouldy
documents but by actual deeds — that is to say, by producing his
credentials. Constitutional theories are all very well to humbug .
That every will must consider every other will its equal—would be a principle hostile to life, an agent of the dissolution and destruction of man, an attempt to assassinate the future of man, a sign of weariness, a secret path to nothingness
'Equality of conditions' is its debasing shibboleth and
verily he who has temerity enough to spit upon Equality is liable to
be horned to death.
False but seductive political idealisms
subtle supplements to the
fallacious, and equally delusive, (but pre-existent) religionisms and
moralisms. This cunning plot worked like a charm, for Equity of
Rights seemed to puritanic minds the logical outcome of that other
hoary old lie 'Equality before God.'
Many years after the 'Declaration' was issued, our written
Constitution was constructed with much voluble sophistry and
mimic strife. That document considered as a whole, is the most
cunningly worded and at the same time most terrible instrument of
Government and Mastership that any Anglo-Teutonic tribe has ever
yoked itself up under. Pretending to 'grant' liberty and self-
government, it practically annihilates both. Under the show of
'guaranteeing' personal independence and civil rights, it has
organized an elective tyranny
Indeed the written Constitution of our Republic is a
monstrous mechanical contrivance that bids fair (when once it has
got properly under way) to squeeze the very heart out of all the Best
Elements in America.
Thus it will be seen, the Jesuitic 'Evangel of Equality' has
proved itself a tremendous success. It seduced the American People
into a feeling of contentment and security till their 'bonds' and
fetters were properly forged, polished, and neatly riveted on........
Under the hypnotic spell of a 'free and equal' dream,
Americans have been hustled into a convict-prison of labonousness
to piratical masters a thousand times more terrible and more
unyielding than any history can describe. All that is now left of
Liberty is its name, and the harmless privilege the common people
have of scolding their Proprietors in vulgar editorial diatribes at or
about election times
Equality before the Law!! is all we mean, whimpers the
everlasting sophistic the cunning liar!
But, by what rational
method can any two litigants be placed in a position of
unconditional 'Equality before the Law?' First of all, plaintiff and
defendant always possess totally different physical and mental
characteristics, different personal magnetisms, and different sized
bank balances. Also, all judges, juries, and legal officials are
unequals in temperament, ability, courage, and honesty. Each one
has his own peculiar idiosyncrasies, prejudices, inferiorities,
superstitions, and price. Each again, may be more or less
dishonest and more or less subject to financial pressure or caste
bias . No two men are born alike, each one being literally born under
his own particular star, formed of different material, swayed by
different ideals, educated and moulded in a different mill, by a
different process.
Even if all tribunals of Justice were founded upon blind
Impartiality and administered free of cost, it will be plainly seen,
that 'Equality before the Law' remains a mere chimera, a dream;
and of no real value. 'Equality before the Law' is just a meaningless
catchword, something like that famous Jesuitism 'Liberty
regulated by Law.'
All judges are authorized avengers, armed to the teeth
a confederation of masterful
bandits to place themselves in positions of absolute equality, before
their intended victims
Las Casas, the Spanish Jesuit, was the first in America to
spread word about the false, subversive, and shameful theory of
'equal human rights,' but since his time it has been boastfully
accepted on all sides, by vast hordes of witless persons who are in
all countries, the numerical majority. "The race of fools" as Plato
sagaciously remarked, "is not to be counted" not even in this 'land of the free.'
Although Equality (in any shape) has never been
scientifically proven nor logically defended: nevertheless it passes
from tongue to tongue, from brain to brain in current discussions
for 'gospel truth' just as clever counterfeit coins are passed
unuspectingly from hand to hand.
The Equality superstition is tolerated by clear-seeing men,
for one reason only. It assists them to govern the thoughts: and by
governing the thoughts, to exploit the property, energy, and labor-
force, of their soft-minded, good natured neighbors: who really
believe it to be true— who think it, glad tidings of Great Joy.
Inequality of birth and condition, can never perish from off
the earth. Never! and why should it? Who can fill the valleys up and
lay the mountains low?
In actual life, he who claims equality with another, is ever
called upon to prove his claim, not by a grotesque abracadabra of
silly phrases, parroted from antique philosophers or blue-mouldy
documents but by actual deeds — that is to say, by producing his
credentials. Constitutional theories are all very well to humbug .
That every will must consider every other will its equal—would be a principle hostile to life, an agent of the dissolution and destruction of man, an attempt to assassinate the future of man, a sign of weariness, a secret path to nothingness
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)